I had similar experiences with F-Secure.
We dropped them. Our only acceptable alternative was eSafe by Aladdin for AV. We
eliminated a bunch because we have a severe fear of proxy servers. Now that I
have had the chance to look at the UFP and CVP thing, I don't think that
it will be a huge deal.
Brian Drake
Central Technology
Services
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Martin
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:02 PM
To:
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [FW-1] CVP and UFP
for Http
Don't know about you but I'm having a dickens of a time
just using CVP (I've got a test group of about 10 users and it's
RRRRRREEEEEEEAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLYYYYYYYY slowed up the connectivity...this is
using F-Secure AV for Firewalls for Linux). It's at the point that I'm
probably going to look at a different solution than the CVP kind. Don't know what vendor
you're going to use for your CVP AV server but I wouldn't recommend
F-Secure at this point...can't seem to get decent tech support from
them. Maybe others have had better
luck w/ F-Secure but I can't claim that I have.
Good luck. I'll be
interested in hearing what your experience is.
Kevin
Martin
[email protected]
Stafford Trading Inc. Chief Security Officer
Chicago, IL 60604 TEL
230 S. LaSalle, Ste. 688
-----Original
Message-----
From: Drake, Brian
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18,
2001 10:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [FW-1] CVP and UFP for
Http
Are
there any issues sending Http traffic through both CVP for Antivirus and UFP
for content filtering? We are looking at sending one http request through both.
Brian Drake
Central Technology Services
