[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FW-1] Which is faster, 3DES or CAST128
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: [FW-1] Which is faster, 3DES or CAST128
- From: Volker Tanger <[email protected]>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 12:28:27 +0200
- Organization: DiSCON GmbH
- References: A<[email protected]>
- Reply-To: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>
- Sender: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
Greetings!
According to
http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~bosselae/fast.html
CAST is ~4 times faster than 3DES - but roughly 50% slower than AES or
Blowfish, so
Lars Troen wrote:
> You should also consider AES as it's created with
> cpu load in mind.
is a good advice.
Bye
Volker Tanger
IT-Security Consulting
--
discon gmbh
Wrangelstra�e 100
D-10997 Berlin
fon +49 30 6104-3307
fax +49 30 6104-3461
[email protected]
http://www.discon.de/
=================================================
To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages,
send an email to [email protected]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[email protected]
=================================================