|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW-1] websense versus surfcontrol
Surfcontrol is in the process of releasing a Standalone version of the Web Filter on Solaris 7 (end of October I believe) as well as Windows. It can be used as a proxy (although I'm still determining the performance) or as a gateway to a proxy. If you are familiar with the old SurfWatch Web Filter, it is more complete than that. By the way, SurfWatch was bought out by SurfControl and then shelved and is no longer being supported as of March, 2002. SurfControl originally developed a UFP server that was integrated with Checkpoint, however, the feature set was very limited and like Lars said (below), I would be concerned with performance/stability issues. Surfcontrol is available for evaluation if you want to look at it http://www.surfcontrol.com On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:20:27AM +0200, Lars Troen wrote: > Daniel, > It's best to do this on the proxy. There are several performance/stability > issues when using it with firewall-1 UFP. WebSense is a nice product and can > be used along with MS Proxy Server/MS ISA Server. I haven't used SurfControl > tho, but I believe their url database is much smaller than websense's. > > Lars > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 > > [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Daniel > > Morone > > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 16:12 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [FW-1] websense versus surfcontrol > > > > > > I can't find an objective comparision between WebSense and > > SurfControl. Could you please share your experience good or bad > > with either of these products as a UFP server? Also, anybody > > done this with HA? > > > > We currently implement a filter at our proxy server and are > > interested in moving to the firewall/UFP. It appears the top > > two contenders are WebSense and SurfControl. We may continue > > doing reporting off the proxy logs as that's where authentication occurs. > > > > Looking for comments about: > > - list quality > > - administration > > - performance > > - stability > > - support > > > > > > ================================================================== > > ============== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > > ================================================================== > > ============== > > > > > ================================================================================ > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ================================================================================ -- Thomas Uczekaj Internet Services Admin Viking Freight Inc================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
