[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] RADWARE FireProof and SecuRemote
Personally I think if your vendor is not capable of supporting or at least informing you if a similar solution, hard or not, exist for your problem, you should consider buying support from somebody else. (Just a side-track remark) Gijs -----Original Message----- From: Cedric [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 6:38 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [FW1] RADWARE FireProof and SecuRemote Hello lchiavacci, lboi> I would like to know if anyone has set up a SecuRemote connection with a lboi> FW1 whose external interface address gets NATTED by something before (it lboi> might be a router or a FireProof). There is no easy way to solve that problem. Two approaches 1) radware : You assign one particular IP adress range to a single firewall. Hence, the connection is never load balanced. 2) You have to use the "firewall cluster" function, use HA, and add a virtual IP to the load balancers. That's clean but hard. In either case ; you need a good knowledge of the FP platform. ;( ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|