NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FW1] AntiVirus solution for FW1?



I use Esafe for the labs in my classroom and our enterprise uses it in
production.  1 more vote for Esafe.

P.S.  We sell it too. ;)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Darden" <[email protected]>
To: "'CryptoTech'" <[email protected]>; "Zinski, Steve"
<[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 2:50 PM
Subject: RE: [FW1] AntiVirus solution for FW1?


>
> Symantecs NAV for firewalls uses CVP 1.0, as opposed to more
> "contemporary"
> products that use the more robust, and reliable (that might be a
> stretch)
> CVP 2.0. I have had many customers attempt to use Nortons with no
> success.
> We also use and recommend Esafe. We found Trends interface to be kludgy,
> and
> difficult to use. Esafe seems to be a bit easier to use and configure.
> WARNING - I work for a VAR that sells Esafe, so I might seem a little
> partial. However, I have tested both Trend, and Esafe. They both do a
> good
> job. I prefer Esafe.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CryptoTech [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 3:11 PM
> To: Zinski, Steve
> Cc: '[email protected]'
> Subject: Re: [FW1] AntiVirus solution for FW1?
>
>
>
> I also use esafe, and have been very pleased.
>
> "Zinski, Steve" wrote:
>
> > Hello, I posted a message several days ago about problems we are
> having
> with
> > Symantec's Norton AntiVirus for Firewalls (v1.5) working with our FW1.
> I
> > received several messages from other people having the same problems
> which
> > leads me to believe that Symantec's NAV product is simply not ready
> for
> > prime time. :-(
> >
> > I am working with Trend Micro, maker of VirusWall, to evaluate and
> possibly
> > purchase their product. Several people recommend this solution for
> scrubbing
> > SMTP traffic at the firewall. Although I do plan to install and test
> their
> > 30-day eval, I'd like to get the opinion of others who are actually
> running
> > Trend's product. Are you satisfied with the performance of VirusWall?
> Are
> > there any problems that I should watch out for? Any information would
> be
> > greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Steve Zinski
> > Senior Network Specialist
> > University of Richmond, Virginia
> >
> >
> ========================================================================
> ====
> ====
> >      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the
> instructions at
> >                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> >
> ========================================================================
> ====
> ====
>
>
>
> ========================================================================
> ====
> ====
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions
> at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ========================================================================
> ====
> ====
>
>
> ========================================================================
> ========
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions
> at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ========================================================================
> ========


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================



 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.