Re: [FW1] Remote Access for Staff.

[Ihsan Cakmakli <icakmakli@FW1-NOSPAMykb.com>]

I think the physical security risk is nearly the same, as you have an
active phone line on network. AAA is one step further...

> depends on your authentication scheme...
>
> icakmakli@ykb.com wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think there is a need some kind of RAS-box for staff. If you trust
> your
> > Internet connection or your ISP SLA, Vpn won't be a problem. But,
> even if
> > you have a small number of users that will use the classical RAS or
> backup
> > modem pool, security risk is likely to be same. Isn't it?
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > Ihsan Cakmakli
> > Bilpa A.S.
> >
> > >I have to provide remote access for various members of staff
> (managers,
> > >directors, anyone else with friends in high places...... )
> > >If possible, these users would like to access their network drives
> and all
> > other
> > >internal services as if at their desk.
> > >Our network is based entirely on TCP/IP (i.e. netbios over ip, no
> IPX
> > etc).
> > >Now, this can be provided using RAS on NT but should this RAS box
> be in
> > the
> > DMZ?
> >
> >
> ================================================================================
> >      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the
> instructions at
> >                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> >
>



================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================