Search
display
10
30
100
results
words begin
exact words
any words part
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: [FW-1] Implied NAT rules
To
:
[email protected]
Subject
: Re: [FW-1] Implied NAT rules
From
: Mike Feetham <
[email protected]
>
Date
: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:29:20 -0500
Importance
: Normal
In-reply-to
: <1F48E82A2A44D511A5F00002A50A613C06D00436@denverhqmail2.noamer.teletech.com>
Reply-to
: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <
[email protected]
>
Sender
: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <
[email protected]
>
Title:
Message
Thanks. It never occurred to me that the NAT rules were not handled the same as the security rules.
Prev by Date:
Re: [FW-1] SecurRemote + Multiple subnets
Next by Date:
Re: [FW-1] Redirect trafic on FW1-4.1?
Previous by thread:
Re: [FW-1] Implied NAT rules
Next by thread:
[FW-1] Site to site VPN between NGFP3 & Sonicwall
Index(es):
Date
Thread
All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.