NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[FW-1] SmartDefense or not



I have been reading a little on the CheckPoint SmartDefense datasheet. Basically it look very nice, but....
 
I am currently running FW-1 4.1 SP3 on Solaris 7, and I don't want to upgrade either of them.
Will SmartDefense run on this platform?
 
http://www.checkpoint.com/products/protect/smartdefense_attack_defeated.html says:
Denial of Service DoS Attacks
- SYN Flood
- LANd
IP Attacks
- IPSpoofing
- IPFragmentation
- Illegal and Malformed Packets
Web and Application Vulnerabilities
- DNS Attacks
- Protocol Non-compliance
- Application-specific Vulnerabilities
- Trojan Horses
- Back Door and Remote Administration
- Mobile Code (Java, _javascript_, Active-X)
- Hidden File Extensions
Network Probing
- Port Scanning
- Service Scanning
 
I need to have the original source ip adresses in my webserver log files, so I cannot use the HTTP Security Servers because of the proxy functionality.
If I do not use the SmartDefense HTTP Security Servers, I guess I will loose all the "Web and Application Vulnerabilities" ?!?
 
Then all this is left:
- SYN Flood
- LANd
- IPSpoofing
- IPFragmentation
- Illegal and Malformed Packets
- Port Scanning
- Service Scanning
 
There is already some IPSpoofing and SYN Flood defense in the basic FW-1, so what I will pay for is:
- LANd
- IPFragmentation
- Illegal and Malformed Packets
- Port Scanning
- Service Scanning
 
Correct ???
Will it be totally overkill to buy SmartDefense ???
Is there another product I should look at?
 
best regards
Jan


 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.