Search

	display results
words begin exact words any words part

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FW-1] FW-1 vs PIX

To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FW-1] FW-1 vs PIX
From: Andre Doehn <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:51:00 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>
Sender: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>

Title: RE: [FW-1] FW-1 vs PIX

> My Company is presently mulling over the idea of changing
> from FW1 to PIX.
> Has anybody made this change? If so , why and were there any benefits?
> We also use Viruswall as a CVP server with FW1.Has anybody
> had real life experiences getting this to work with a PIX?

pix doesn´t support any content security - you have to think about another solution like
the viruswall acting as smtp store and forwarder.

bye
andre

References:
- [FW-1] FW-1 vs PIX
  - From: Bradley Jayanath <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [FW-1] NAT and "too many internal hosts"
Next by Date: Re: [FW-1] big trouble with NG
Previous by thread: [FW-1] FW-1 vs PIX
Next by thread: Re: [FW-1] FW-1 vs PIX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread