NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FW-1] Static NAT in NT


  • To: [email protected]
  • Subject: Re: [FW-1] Static NAT in NT
  • From: Aeon Hale <[email protected]>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:58:02 -0500
  • Reply-to: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>
  • Sender: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>
  • Thread-index: AcGrOSbEqXgoCid9TdmaoFgLJZvmowAAAyDg
  • Thread-topic: Re: [FW-1] Static NAT in NT

4.1 sp3



-----Original Message-----
From: Don [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FW-1] Static NAT in NT


What version of Firewall-1 is this?

> Hey everyone, I need somebody to confirm that I'm not going crazy.  I
> setup a FW machine for a client.  Real basic setup.  Running NT, FW-1
> 4.1 sp3.  2 Nics, one internal net, one external.  All users are HIDE
> NAT but wants me to static NAT one address for a test exchange server
on
> internal net (yes, I know, shouldn't have it on internal net).  This
> setup isn't hard by all means.  Basically,
>
> 1.  Add NAT rules
> 2.  Add static route
> 3.  Add arp entry
> 4.  Create local.arp in state directory
>
>
> Well, I've created automatic and then manual NAT rules....doesn't work
> I've put static routes...doesn't work
> i've added arp entries...doesn't work
> local.arp file is there...doesn't work.
>
>
> That exchange server will not get passed the firewall.  I look at the
> logs and they say that they are translating the address (i.e source
> 10.x.x.x Xlated source 209.x.x.x) but gets nowhere.  That machine
cannot
> even ping the internet router (default gateway for firewall) but all
> other machines can.
>
> What am I missing?  Ive set this up a million times.  Even more weird,
> his current FW is the same setup, NT, 2 nics, FW-1 4.1 but on a slower
> machine but NATS perfect.  I've compared the two boxes and I cannot
see
> what the differences are...
>
> Any help would be great.
>
> Thanks,..
>
> =================================================
> To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages,
> send an email to [email protected]
> in the BODY of the email add:
> set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
> =================================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> =================================================
> If you have any questions on how to change your
> subscription options, email
> [email protected]
> =================================================
>

=================================================
To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages,
send an email to [email protected]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[email protected]
=================================================

=================================================
To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages,
send an email to [email protected]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[email protected]
=================================================



 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.