|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW-1] Checkpoint vs. Cisco VPN Client
IMHO SecureRemote/Client is much better: SecureRemote can tunnel through UDP, this allows it to work from home behind the cheap consumer firewalls and from hotels with ethernet and address translation. SecureClient includes a client firewall. AFAIK Cisco does not yet have this. Frank On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Gasaway, Troy wrote: > Checkpoint. So, I need some strong facts as to why Checkpoint has a > better VPN setup for the client side than Cisco. Unfortunately I am not > up on Cisco products to much, but I hear that you can use Microsoft's > IPSEC client to connect to a Cisco VPN device instead of using the Cisco > client. I think this is the main reason he wants to use Cisco. Can you ================================================= To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages, send an email to [email protected] in the BODY of the email add: set fw-1-mailinglist nomail ================================================= To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================= If you have any questions on how to change your subscription options, email [email protected] =================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
