| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[FW-1] Checkpoint vs. Cisco VPN Client
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: [FW-1] Checkpoint vs. Cisco VPN Client
- From: "Gasaway, Troy" <[email protected]>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:17:58 -0600
- Reply-to: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>
- Sender: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>
- Thread-index: AcGk+n4LKw4vQKQjQMGYYylX4B5xVwAEX/Kg
- Thread-topic: [FW-1] MRTG
Okay, we have a new boss how loves Cisco and he thinks it is the answer
to all. So, he has already ruled that all Site-to-Site VPNs are to be
replace with Cisco gear. Now he is asking about the client side of
Checkpoint. So, I need some strong facts as to why Checkpoint has a
better VPN setup for the client side than Cisco. Unfortunately I am not
up on Cisco products to much, but I hear that you can use Microsoft's
IPSEC client to connect to a Cisco VPN device instead of using the Cisco
client. I think this is the main reason he wants to use Cisco. Can you
use Windows 2K to connect to Checkpoint or do I have to use the
Checkpoint Client?
Thanks,
Troy
=================================================
To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages,
send an email to [email protected]
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email
[email protected]
=================================================
|
|
