|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW-1] SecuRemote through NAT device???
Hi there I was curious - why is IKE better? For some reason we can only use FWZ.... on the client machines, we get an error stating that we cannot use IKE... Thanks Russell PS - Yes, I am new to this... -----Original Message----- From: Stanley Lieberman [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:13 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [FW-1] SecuRemote through NAT device??? Here are some things I have found successful in setting this up: Setup ike, not fwz on linksys open up protocol 50 and 51, udp 500 on linksys default address is 192.168.1.1, if inside lan is same change ip address on linksys On 4.1 you do not need to change anything in objects.c Good luck Stanley ================================================= To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages, send an email to [email protected] in the BODY of the email add: set fw-1-mailinglist nomail ================================================= To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================= If you have any questions on how to change your subscription options, email [email protected] ================================================= ================================================= To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages, send an email to [email protected] in the BODY of the email add: set fw-1-mailinglist nomail ================================================= To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================= If you have any questions on how to change your subscription options, email [email protected] =================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
