Re: [FW-1] SecuRemote and USB based Interfaces

[Phil_Gaskell@FW1-NOSPAMVERITASDGC.CO.UK]

I have had success with using SR/SC with ADSL via USB, works without a
problem.
Regarding NAT, I have also ran SR/SC behind a gateway (Win 98SE) that has
ADSL via USB running MS Internet connection sharing.
The box (tested NT and W2K), behind the gateway was running SR/SC 4185 and
udp_encapsulation.
The gateway system just used a zonealarm home fw, SC doesn't work with ICS.
The above setup works fine.. no problems.

I also experimented with having SR/SC on the ADSL/USB gateway system.
I got SR to work on a W2K system, the SC policy would be disabled if ICS
was enabled.
I guess this is an unsupported config and may not work in future realease
of sr/sc
Tried the above on Win98SE on the gateway, SR would blow away big time.

Let me know if you want further info.....

Phil

>Date:    Thu, 13 Dec 2001 11:57:39 +0000
>From:    x fw1 <xfw1@HOTMAIL.COM>
>Subject: Re: SecuRemote and USB based Interfaces
>
>I think the problem is probably more just the 'ole NAT issue rather than
>USB.
>

=================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
=================================================
To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages,
send an email to LISTSERV@lists.us.checkpoint.com
in the BODY of the email add:
set fw-1-mailinglist nomail
=================================================
If you have any questions on how to change your
subscription options, email Ron Alcatraz at:
ralcatra@ts.checkpoint.com
=================================================