[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [FW-1] Pix vs FW1
Hi We're looking into a fault tolerant firewall solution and would appreciate some real world feedback. We need the failover to be 100% stateful, VPNs and all. There cannot be any renegotiation of tunnels if we're in the middle of a transaction, it needs to be seamless. We have narrowed down our options to Cisco PIX and FW-1 using Rainwall. We would use the Cisco version of Enterprise Management Console - I think it is called VMS (VPN Monitoring / Security Management Solution) so management isn't an issue (unless VMS is no good). I appreciate that Rainwall is load balancing instead of failover but it seems to do what we want. Our major issue is that the FW-1 solution is 3-4 times the price of the Cisco solution however if the functionality is so much better we could persuade the powers that be. Any info gratefully received. Ali Port. ================================================= To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================= To set vacation, Out Of Office, or away messages, send an email to [email protected] in the BODY of the email add: set fw-1-mailinglist nomail ================================================= If you have any questions on how to change your subscription options, email Ron Alcatraz at: [email protected] =================================================
|