NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FW-1] Reliability of FW-1 with Linux



Interesting experience,

wie have also the same experience with nearly the same big installation
Solaris plattforms. The CPU utilisation on then FW1 modules seems under 5 %.
But we have to make observe the installation for longer time in the future.
We have no problems with the kernel.

Am Freitag, 23. November 2001 15:59 schrieb Paul Toyne:
> Jorg wrote:
> > I'm interested in any information about the reliability, any
> > installation and operation flaws, performance issues and general pros
> > and cons about running FW-1 (4.1 or NG) together with
> > Rainwall on Linux.
>
> After experiencing big problems with FW-1 4.1 on Windows NT whereby
> it would crash the firewall on a regular basis we decided to try out
> FW-1 4.1 on RedHat Linux.  The performance increase with running on
> Linux was immediately noticable and rather than the CPU running at
> the 100% mark that Windows NT had been, we never found it above 2%
> utilisation.
>
> The only installation issue was concerned with rebuilding the kernel.
> FW-1 said it required the SMP kernel, however we couldn't get it to
> work with SMP compiled in at all.  We recompiled without SMP support
> and FW-1 worked a treat.
>
> We used it between two 100mb LAN segments with a peak throughput of
> around 10mb/sec passing through the firewall.
>
> The firewall performed flawlessly until we had a power failure in our
> comms room.  Unfortunately we had plugged the monitor into the UPS
> rather than the PC, thus we had a dead PC.  Also when we came to restore
> the system from the backup tapes we found that the backups had been
> failing (despite the backup software telling us it had been successful).
> It still only took around 8 hours to completely reinstall Linux,
> Firewall-1, the objects (around 300) and the rulebase.  Had the computer
> been correctly plugged into the UPS we wouldn't have had the above problem
> anyway.
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Toyne
>
> ===============================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ===============================================

===============================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
===============================================



 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.