[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW-1] H323 and Checkpoint FW
We would also like to understand the issues. We're looking at building an internal IP-based video conferencing network, but having this traffic separate from the data network. The ISP and the equipment vendor actually have published documentation saying that H323 traffic does not like firewalls. They go one to recommend either a separate Internet connection for video conferencing traffic or putting this traffic on the outside of the firewall. We need to pursue with them the REASONS why... Having a separate high speed network for VC traffic may be OK for a video conferencing center, but what about people with desktop cameras that want to participate on their regular data network using H323? We'll be digging deeper into this. At 09:19 AM 11/2/01 -0500, Nooman wrote: I am even having problem with SP2, the firewall rejects the packet trying to open tcp port 3230 which we allow for our Video Cameras at different sites. It says rule 0 is responsible for this "reason: tried to open port x, port:x" Do any one have any idea?
|