| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FW-1] direction??
- To: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: [FW-1] direction??
- From: Hal Dorsman <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 10:45:03 -0700
- Reply-to: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>
- Sender: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 <[email protected]>
- Thread-index: AcFmGNj8KyHExWhqQ52GncRYXXxLgwACHUQA
- Thread-topic: Re: [FW-1] direction??
> -----Original Message-----
> From: erik witkop [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:34 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [FW-1] direction??
>
>
> that does not sound right. Can I have your reference, becuase
> everything I
> have read states that inbound is entering the FW, and visa versa.
Yes, that's what he said. It defines whether the rule is read entering
or leaving the FW. That has nothing to do with the direction of the
rule.
>
>
> And besides, you still have not answered the question at hand!
He tried, you just aren't getting it. Have you RTFM?
Hal
>
>
>
> Erik Witkop
> Boston, MA
> For Drug Testing Kits
> please visit:
> http://www.abatekmedical.com
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Iztok Umek" <[email protected]>
> >To: "Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1"
> ><[email protected]>
> >CC: <[email protected]>
> >Subject: RE: [FW-1] direction??
> >Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:20:14 -0500
> >
> >You are missing an important fundamental, yes.
> >
> >Inbound = traversing up the TCP/IP stack
> >Outbound = traversing down the TCP/IP stack
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> > Iztok
> >
> >
> >---
> >Iztok Umek
> >Elogex, Inc.
> >212 S Tryon Street
> >Charlotte, NC 28281
> >Phone:> >Fax:> >URL: http://www.elogex.com/
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: erik witkop [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 10:41
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [FW-1] direction??
> > >
> > >
> > > I am missing an important fundamental. In my rule base, I can
> > > change the pull down menu for the direction to inbound,
> > > outbound, or eitherbound. This appears to be a global
> > > command, meaning applies to all lines in my policy. What if I
> > > want to have one line in my policy going outbound, and then
> > > the next one is inbound. I am sure this is possible, I just
> > > don't know how it works?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Erik Witkop
> > > Boston, MA
> > > For Drug Testing Kits
> > > please visit:
> > > http://www.abatekmedical.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> > >
> > >
> > > ===============================================
> > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> > > please see the instructions at
> > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.htm> l
> > >
> > > ===============================================
> > >
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
> ===============================================
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
> please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ===============================================
>
===============================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list,
please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
===============================================
|
|
