[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0
Claes, What do you mean by "What nic's are u running?" ?I have 3 ethenret configured and there are no errors on the interfaces. The SMP kernel is intalled for default since i have a two cpu system. CP claims to support RH 7.0 SMP kernel. My kernel is: 2.2.16-22smp #1 SMP The system works really fine and performing. Do you think i should intall some kernel upgrade? I dod not patch anything on the system after the first installation. What happens if a have 2 CPUS running a non SPM kernel. Is the NON SMP kerner present on the system or I have to recompile it? Best Regards, -----Original Message----- From: Claes Jansson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 11:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 What nic's are u running? And have u tried with a non-smp kernel? Check this to be sure that it's not the SMP kernel that mess things up. Im currently running i similar enviroment (~2000 users) Rh7 (2.2.19-7.0.8) + Cpfw4.1-sp5. My firewall cpu-load is less than 0.1. But im not running any VPN traffic from the firewall. Hardware is (P3-1Ghz, 256Mb RAM, 2x Intel Dual Port 100 Pro NIC's, Asus CUSL2-C Motherboard). best regards. //Claes Jansson At 09:32 2001-10-17 +0200, you wrote: >On the system there is a squid proxy(configured with no disk cache). >The squid load is about 45 http_req/s during the day, with about 3000 users. > >The system has 512MB RAM and 2 1000Mz Intel CPUs. > >Best Regards, > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Claes Jansson [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:05 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 > > >What load are we talking about? Users and Bandwidth. > >best regards, > > //Claes Jansson > >At 18:28 2001-10-16 +0200, you wrote: > >I spoke too early...the problem still remains. > >It happens during the day with higher system load. > > > > > >Bes Regards, > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Sommariva Graziano [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:19 AM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 > > > > > >After ugrading to SP5 no more problems, besides SP3 did not claim to >support > >7.0 multiprocessor kernel. > > > >Best Regards, > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Jochen Höchner [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 11:30 PM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 > > > > > >no works fine !!! > >do you have enough RAM and hard disk space ??? > > > ><<< Sommariva Graziano <[email protected]> 10/15 5:36p >>> > >Did you have my same problem in sp3? > > > >Best regards, > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: António Cardoso [mailto:[email protected]] > >Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 4:26 PM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 > > > > > > > >Try with sp4 or sp5 i've managed to put one to work with sp4 and another > >with sp5 > > > >António Cardoso > >[email protected] > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Sommariva Graziano [ mailto:[email protected] > ><mailto:[email protected]> ] > >Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:44 PM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 > > > > > >I do agree in part. > > > >I did excatly what you say, but the system hang 50% of time while intalling > >new polices from ManST. It works fine, if it does not freeze. > > > >Best regards, > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Jochen Höchner [ mailto:[email protected] > ><mailto:[email protected]> ] > >Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 6:51 PM > >To: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 > > > > > >oh, it's no problem. > >1st you gotta install the rh 7, then the check point 4.1 for linux, but > >don't start it. after a service pak install sp3 and later it works without > >any problem. > > > ><<< Aeon Hale <[email protected]> 10/11 12:55p >>> > >I'm trying to get Checkpoint installed on RH 7.0. It's being a pain. Basic > >RH installation. In fact, off the 4.1, SP2 Checkpoint CD, rpm -ih ***.rpm > >works great. It installs Base version of checkpoint no problem, i think > >version 414**...not sure of the rest. Anyway, I get it all setup, >licensed, > >users, gui-clients, etc....reboot...no prob. I goto upgrade to SP2 or SP3, > >it doesn't like that. Says it need CPfw-1 installed first. I run rpm -u > >..rpm --nodeps (which usually works in the past) and it > >installs....doesn't seem to be giving me grief. I goto reboot...KERNEL > >PANIC... > > > >I know somebody out that has successuflly installed this on 7.0. I've done > >6.2 way too many times and I'd be happy to stick with it, but RH 6.2 >doesn't > >like my AMD Athlon CPU. > > > >Any help would be appreciated. > > > >Thanks, > > > >Aeon Hale > >Security Engineer > >CCSA,CCSE,CCSI > >Accenture > > > > > >=========================================================================== >= > > > >==== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ><http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html> > >=========================================================================== >= > > > >==== > > > >=========================================================================== >= > > > >==== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ><http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html> > >=========================================================================== >= > > > >==== > > > >=============================================== > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, > >please see the instructions at > >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ><http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html> > >=============================================== > > > >=============================================== > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, > >please see the instructions at > >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > >=============================================== > > > >=============================================== > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, > >please see the instructions at > >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > >=============================================== > > > >=============================================== > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, > >please see the instructions at > >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > >=============================================== > > > >=============================================== > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, > >please see the instructions at > >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > >=============================================== > > > >=============================================== > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, > >please see the instructions at > >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > >=============================================== > >=============================================== >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, >please see the instructions at >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html >=============================================== > >=============================================== >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, >please see the instructions at >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html >=============================================== =============================================== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html =============================================== =============================================== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ===============================================
|