[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0
On the system there is a squid proxy(configured with no disk cache). The squid load is about 45 http_req/s during the day, with about 3000 users. The system has 512MB RAM and 2 1000Mz Intel CPUs. Best Regards, -----Original Message----- From: Claes Jansson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:05 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 What load are we talking about? Users and Bandwidth. best regards, //Claes Jansson At 18:28 2001-10-16 +0200, you wrote: >I spoke too early...the problem still remains. >It happens during the day with higher system load. > > >Bes Regards, > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Sommariva Graziano [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 10:19 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 > > >After ugrading to SP5 no more problems, besides SP3 did not claim to support >7.0 multiprocessor kernel. > >Best Regards, > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jochen Höchner [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 11:30 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 > > >no works fine !!! >do you have enough RAM and hard disk space ??? > ><<< Sommariva Graziano <[email protected]> 10/15 5:36p >>> >Did you have my same problem in sp3? > >Best regards, > > >-----Original Message----- >From: António Cardoso [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 4:26 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 > > > >Try with sp4 or sp5 i've managed to put one to work with sp4 and another >with sp5 > >António Cardoso >[email protected] > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Sommariva Graziano [ mailto:[email protected] ><mailto:[email protected]> ] >Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 2:44 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 > > >I do agree in part. > >I did excatly what you say, but the system hang 50% of time while intalling >new polices from ManST. It works fine, if it does not freeze. > >Best regards, > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jochen Höchner [ mailto:[email protected] ><mailto:[email protected]> ] >Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 6:51 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [FW-1] Firewall and RH 7.0 > > >oh, it's no problem. >1st you gotta install the rh 7, then the check point 4.1 for linux, but >don't start it. after a service pak install sp3 and later it works without >any problem. > ><<< Aeon Hale <[email protected]> 10/11 12:55p >>> >I'm trying to get Checkpoint installed on RH 7.0. It's being a pain. Basic >RH installation. In fact, off the 4.1, SP2 Checkpoint CD, rpm -ih ***.rpm >works great. It installs Base version of checkpoint no problem, i think >version 414**...not sure of the rest. Anyway, I get it all setup, licensed, >users, gui-clients, etc....reboot...no prob. I goto upgrade to SP2 or SP3, >it doesn't like that. Says it need CPfw-1 installed first. I run rpm -u >..rpm --nodeps (which usually works in the past) and it >installs....doesn't seem to be giving me grief. I goto reboot...KERNEL >PANIC... > >I know somebody out that has successuflly installed this on 7.0. I've done >6.2 way too many times and I'd be happy to stick with it, but RH 6.2 doesn't >like my AMD Athlon CPU. > >Any help would be appreciated. > >Thanks, > >Aeon Hale >Security Engineer >CCSA,CCSE,CCSI >Accenture > > >=========================================================================== = > >==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ><http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html> >=========================================================================== = > >==== > >=========================================================================== = > >==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ><http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html> >=========================================================================== = > >==== > >=============================================== >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, >please see the instructions at >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ><http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html> >=============================================== > >=============================================== >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, >please see the instructions at >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html >=============================================== > >=============================================== >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, >please see the instructions at >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html >=============================================== > >=============================================== >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, >please see the instructions at >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html >=============================================== > >=============================================== >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, >please see the instructions at >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html >=============================================== > >=============================================== >To unsubscribe from this mailing list, >please see the instructions at >http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html >=============================================== =============================================== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html =============================================== =============================================== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ===============================================
|