[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] Strange NAT and packet transfer within Web server...
Title: RE: [FW1] Strange NAT and packet transfer within Web server... Hi Ralf, I know what rule 0 is in general terms, but I' m wondering why it' s allowed, because there' s no such implied rule and no automatic NAT, or no explicit defined NAT rule either... The questions you' re asking in the 2nd paragraph are the questions I' m also asking, I really don' t know. And as far as I know, my company does not such replication, etc. The Firewalls were configured, installed and set before I participated in the company' s project, so I can only exactly know what' s going on for the current usage of the FW's and what are the current implied rules in the policy editor. (All the things visible and as they seem to be.. in the CP FW management console and rules, etc...) Thank you for your support Ralf, and I'm waiting for any other thoughts, recommendations, suggestions, etc... -----Original Message-----
Mete, Rule 0 means it's accepted because of some implied rule you have checked in
Plus, why would the firewall itself initiate a connection with http to an
Just my spontaneous thoughts...Let's see what others have to say. Cheers
z+z+z+z+z++z++z+z+z+++z+z++z++z+++z+++z+++z++z+z+z+z++z
|