|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW1] Nokia VRRP and RIP v2
RIP would not be able to be used since the RIP protocol would advertise the actual interfaces as their gateway addresses instead of the VRRP virtual IP address. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Larry Pingree Sr. Security Consultant Email: [email protected] SiegeWorks Company WebSite: http://www.siegeworks.com/ Security Installation, Training and Consulting -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ----- Original Message ----- From: Raymond N <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:29 AM Subject: [FW1] Nokia VRRP and RIP v2 > > Hi there, > > Would someone tell me what would happen when two Nokia boxes setup with > VRRPmc on both inside and outside interface, and have RIP v2 enable? Right > now, my internal router has a static route point to the VRRP VIP. But we > want to start using dynamic routing protocol becuase we would have multiple > subnets built in the inside network, each would have a cisco router to > route traffic between inside subnets as well as to the Nokia (Internet > connection). So, I want to use RIP v2 instead of keep adding static routes. > > Thanks. > > > > > > ============================================================================ ==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ============================================================================ ==== > > ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
