NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [FW1] SecuRemote implementation problems



Stephen,
 For your winnt and win2k users you should be able to setup hardware
profiles that include/exclude the necessary interfaces and then load
Securemote on the interface that needs to be used at home.  Then the users
just need to login to the correct profile.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: Felicetti, Stephen A. [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:49 PM
To: ''[email protected]' '
Subject: [FW1] SecuRemote implementation problems


Hi everyone...

For the past couple weeks, I've been attempting to get a handle on
SecuRemote.
I'm able to establish the connection using Win98, WinNT, and Win2k. Using
Hybrid mode IKE. I manually distribute the userc.c file to each client.
*However*, only Win98 is working 100%, but only as long as I disable the
internal NIC interface (which has a static IP address for our internal
network) This will be a problem for the end-users when they travel between
home and office. No explanation needed there, I'm sure... So that's one
problem.

With both WinNT and Win2k, I also have to disable the internal NIC interface
(same reasons as above). But I'm not able to communicate with any of our
public web servers. They work fine *before* the VPN is established, but not
afterward. The FW log shows the initial http connection going through, but
then no more traffic is passed to the client, and it times out. Strange
thing is....ftp and telnet work fine. 

Is anyone out there successfully using this product in a multiple OS
environment? And if so, have you experienced any of these problems?

At this point, I doubt I'll be able to release this to my users and will be
forced to look for another 'client to site' VPN client.
>From messages I've read on the list, this wont be easy.
But I've found one company that claims they have tested it against
CheckPoint and will be releasing it in June. www.neon.com. Anybody know
anything about it?

Any words of encouragement are appreciated.

Thanks,
Steve






~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stephen A. Felicetti				Fox Chase Cancer Center
Sr. Network Engineer(v)
Research Information Technology Facility(f)
[email protected] 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================



 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.