[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] IBM 5494 Connection
David, Again, if it's set up to bridge IP traffic, and this requires support on the AS/400 side as well, it will be a bridge, not a router. Bridges are transparent from an IP perspective, so the next node "over" with an IP address will probably be the AS/400, or perhaps a node on a LAN attached to the AS/400 (probably the first). Bridges do not get IP addresses (except for management, in some cases). Are you, in fact, trying to use the link back to the AS/400 site to carry IP (eg. the AS/400 site is acting as your ISP), or are you trying to provide access to the 5494 via TCP/IP (eg. via TN5250)? I'm not sure the latter is possible. -Robert At 08:35 AM 5/10/01 -0400, [email protected] wrote: >Thanks, >And yes it is being used as a bridge or gateway, but not using IP traffic. >It is only passing SNA traffic. The 5494 controller will not have any ip >assigned to it. That is my problem. I do not see how I can attaches this >device off my firewall without an ip assigned to the Ethernet interface of >the device. Our client that we are setting this up for, does not use IP >traffic only SNA for their AS/400 systems. Any ideas? Can this be done? >Thanks > >-----Original Message----- >From: Robert C. Wessel [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 11:30 PM >To: [email protected]; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [FW1] IBM 5494 Connection > > >David, > >Are your trying to use the 5494 as a bridge for IP traffic? If so, then >there's not too much to do (other than setting up the 5494 and its partner >bridge), although I've never done it personally. The local LAN will appear >to be on the same subnet as the LAN on the "other" side of the pair of >bridges, and the bridges (as always) will be transparent to the IP layer of >things, even though the 5494 is quite a traditional bridge. > >You may care to check out the 5494 doc: > >http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/CO20BK05 > >Chapter 8 of the "5494 Planning Guide" talks about the bridging support. > >-Robert > >At 11:24 AM 5/9/01 -0400, [email protected] wrote: >> >>Hi, >>I have a requirement to have a IBM 5494 Remote Control Unit attached to our >>firewall. >>The unit is used with a AS/400 system on a distant end. >>We are going to have a T1 point-to-point between us and our distant end. >>Our client is configuring this 5494 Control unit to us SNA end-to-end. >>The workstations will talk to this using IBM client access software pointed >>to the Mac address of the Ethernet interface on the IBM 5494. >>My question is how can I connect this unit to one of my available Ethernet >>interfaces on my Nokia IP440 Firewall without an IP address? Is this >>possible? If so any help would be greatly appreciated. >> >>Thank you >> >>David Maas >> >> >> >>=========================================================================== >===== >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at >> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html >>=========================================================================== >===== >> >> > ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|