|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] FW with NAT behind router
I don´t have it running yet but NAT (static) on a router should not affect a VPN (we have a Nortel Contivity Switch that is connected the same way - static NAT). The only cause might be that FW-1 authentication somehow delivers the sourceIP that was entered on Client site within the payload. So I´m still "investigating" an if I´ll come up with something "new" I will post it here... Regards, Marco "David E. Hoobler Jr." <[email protected]> am 04.05.2001 19:24:25 An: Marco Rossi/asap@asap Kopie: Thema: RE: [FW1] FW with NAT behind router I don't think that this will work. If you wish to access private IP addresses inside your firewall, SecuRemote and the firewall must create a tunnel. To do so, the firewall must have a public IP address. David Hoobler -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 11:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [FW1] FW with NAT behind router Hi there, has anybody made it to get FW-1 run like this? LAN <- inofficial IP -> FW1 <- inofficial IP -> Router <- official IP -> Internet <- official IP -> SecuRemote I use static NAT on the router between FW-1 and the Internet (need to be like this). I already looked on phoneboy but didn´t find anything... Maybe one of you knows...? Regards, Marco ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
