NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [FW1] Some packets do not get NATted. Have you seen this befo re?



A little more detail on this:
 
You CAN use NAT on encrypted packets using FWZ, SKIP, and IKE with AH only (no ESP; see below) since the packets are not encapsulated - the original header will be translated.  You can also use NAT on IKE packets using ESP for encapsulation, but the NAT will apply prior to the encryption/encapsulation.  This allows you to do things like create NAT rules to pass traffic over a VPN to sites with the same addressing on both ends.
 
Not sure if this answers Aylton's original question, but hopefully worth at least $0.02.

Dan Hitchcock
CCNA, CCSE, MCSE
Security Analyst
Breakwater Security Associates

[email protected]
http://www.breakwatersecurity.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Holman [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 6:42 AM
To: Aylton Souza, CISSP; fw-1-mailinglist
Subject: Re: [FW1] Some packets do not get NATted. Have you seen this before?

Enrypted packets (FWZ, SKIP, IKE) cannot have NAT applied, as their TCP/IP headers are encrypted, however IPSEC only encrypts the data portion, leaving the headers free for NAT manipulation.
Also bear in mind that NAT won't work with protocols that use embedded IP addresses (RPC, Oracle etc), unless a Proxy has been written for them
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 23 March 2001 05:23
Subject: [FW1] Some packets do not get NATted. Have you seen this before?

Hello friends,
 
I remember some time ago someone was discussing a case in which some packets do not have NAT applied.
 
Anyone remembers other details?
 
Best wishes
 
Aylton


 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.