AW: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC

["Stefan Fassbender" <fossi@FW1-NOSPAMcomputerlinks.de>]

hi chris,
here is whre to get this active x client:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/downloads/recommended/TSAC/default.asp
you need the web package.
there is also a discription for this client...
iis must be running on the terminal server. install it and go to
http://servername/tsweb
also port 3389 for rdp must be open
greetings
stefan

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Chris Swensson [mailto:chris.swensson@vistranetmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. März 2001 22:17
An: fossi@computerlinks.de
Betreff: Fw: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC


Stefan,
i am interested in the active x web interface for TS.  who is miki?  where
can i get more information?

thanks.
Chris


----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Fassbender" <fossi@computerlinks.de>
To: "Jason Witty" <jason@wittys.com>;
<fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 2:51 AM
Subject: AW: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC


>
> hi jason,
> wts is definetly the best choise!
> you can use encryption in diffrent levels (up to 128 bit) depending on law
> districtions and restrict terminal sessions to certain users (configured
in
> tscc.msc).
> the authtentication works with default w2k scheme means kerberos.
> you can install a activex webclient on the wts (have to download from
miki)
> that you can admin from any machine wherever you are without installing an
> rdpclient.
> furthermore rdp uses less bandwith than VNC or pcanywhere.
> last but not least well known hacks are known for VNC and pcanywhere.
> greetings
> stefan fassbender
>
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com
> [mailto:owner-fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com]Im Auftrag von
> Jason Witty
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Februar 2001 14:56
> An: fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com
> Betreff: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC
>
>
>
> All,
>
> For reasons beyond my control, I must allow remote management of some
> DMZ servers, from my inTRAnet to one of my web-farm DMZs.  I'd hope to
> force everyone to standardize on a single remote admin application,
> however.  Right now, my choices are pcAnywhere, VNC, or Windows2000 WTS.
>
> I know that VNC has had tons of problems, vulnerabilities, etc., so I'm
> pretty much going to try to  that one out first.
>
> Next, is pcAnywhere - I know it can support menial encryption methods,
> and can do dual user auth, which is good, but is it better than.....
>
> The third choice is W2k WTS - It's free, fast, and comes with W2K
> Server, but I know NOTHING about it's security.  All I know is it runs
> on TCP 3389, but I don't have any clue if it has secure communications
> capabilities (encryption), etc.  Any ideas or opinions?  Thanks very
> much.
>
> Jason
>
>
>
============================================================================
> ====
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>
============================================================================
> ====
>
>
>
>
============================================================================
====
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>
============================================================================
====




================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================