Re: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC

[Bill McCabe <dfb2000@FW1-NOSPAMmediaone.net>]

Are you talking about using VNC standalone, or in combination with SSH or ZBD?


At 7:56 AM -0600 2/28/01, Jason Witty wrote:
>All,
>
>For reasons beyond my control, I must allow remote management of some
>DMZ servers, from my inTRAnet to one of my web-farm DMZs.  I'd hope to
>force everyone to standardize on a single remote admin application,
>however.  Right now, my choices are pcAnywhere, VNC, or Windows2000 WTS.
>
>I know that VNC has had tons of problems, vulnerabilities, etc., so I'm
>pretty much going to try to  that one out first.
>
>Next, is pcAnywhere - I know it can support menial encryption methods,
>and can do dual user auth, which is good, but is it better than.....
>
>The third choice is W2k WTS - It's free, fast, and comes with W2K
>Server, but I know NOTHING about it's security.  All I know is it runs
>on TCP 3389, but I don't have any clue if it has secure communications
>capabilities (encryption), etc.  Any ideas or opinions?  Thanks very
>much.
>
>Jason
>
>
>===============================================================================
>=
>     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>===============================================================================
>=





================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================