[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC
Title: RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC
My understanding is that the latest version (9.2?) of pcAnywhere uses UDP, which seems to be a great reason to avoid it.
cheers, dj
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Witty [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 1:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC
All,
For reasons beyond my control, I must allow remote management of some
DMZ servers, from my inTRAnet to one of my web-farm DMZs. I'd hope to
force everyone to standardize on a single remote admin application,
however. Right now, my choices are pcAnywhere, VNC, or Windows2000 WTS.
I know that VNC has had tons of problems, vulnerabilities, etc., so I'm
pretty much going to try to that one out first.
Next, is pcAnywhere - I know it can support menial encryption methods,
and can do dual user auth, which is good, but is it better than.....
The third choice is W2k WTS - It's free, fast, and comes with W2K
Server, but I know NOTHING about it's security. All I know is it runs
on TCP 3389, but I don't have any clue if it has secure communications
capabilities (encryption), etc. Any ideas or opinions? Thanks very
much.
Jason
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================