NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC



Title: RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC

My understanding is that the latest version (9.2?) of pcAnywhere uses UDP, which seems to be a great reason to avoid it.

cheers, dj

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Witty [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 1:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC



All,

For reasons beyond my control, I must allow remote management of some
DMZ servers, from my inTRAnet to one of my web-farm DMZs.  I'd hope to
force everyone to standardize on a single remote admin application,
however.  Right now, my choices are pcAnywhere, VNC, or Windows2000 WTS.

I know that VNC has had tons of problems, vulnerabilities, etc., so I'm
pretty much going to try to that one out first.

Next, is pcAnywhere - I know it can support menial encryption methods,
and can do dual user auth, which is good, but is it better than.....

The third choice is W2k WTS - It's free, fast, and comes with W2K
Server, but I know NOTHING about it's security.  All I know is it runs
on TCP 3389, but I don't have any clue if it has secure communications
capabilities (encryption), etc.  Any ideas or opinions?  Thanks very
much.

Jason


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================



 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.