|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC
TO use W2K TS you would have to run 2000 server on all the machines ie upgrade all servers. This is a little expensive :( but would allow multiple users per server :) you would also need the Citrix ICA protocol (metaframe) to get any decent performance again more expense. Hope this helps Andrew Shore BTcd Information Systems Engineering Internet & Multimedia -----Original Message----- From: Jason Witty [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 28 February 2001 13:56 To: [email protected] Subject: [FW1] pcAnywhere vs. 2000 WTS vs. VNC All, For reasons beyond my control, I must allow remote management of some DMZ servers, from my inTRAnet to one of my web-farm DMZs. I'd hope to force everyone to standardize on a single remote admin application, however. Right now, my choices are pcAnywhere, VNC, or Windows2000 WTS. I know that VNC has had tons of problems, vulnerabilities, etc., so I'm pretty much going to try to that one out first. Next, is pcAnywhere - I know it can support menial encryption methods, and can do dual user auth, which is good, but is it better than..... The third choice is W2k WTS - It's free, fast, and comes with W2K Server, but I know NOTHING about it's security. All I know is it runs on TCP 3389, but I don't have any clue if it has secure communications capabilities (encryption), etc. Any ideas or opinions? Thanks very much. Jason ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
