| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FW1] Nokia vs. NT
Hi tim,
First, let me tell you, I do work for a VAR, but we sell many firewalls,
and we install all types of OS's. But as far as administration, installation
and support, I think the Nokia solution far exceeds the other platforms in
this arena. Many will disagree, but this may be a bias. Why not get a demo
from your var?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Larry Pingree
Sr. Security Consultant
Email: [email protected]
SiegeWorks
Company WebSite: http://www.siegeworks.com/
Security Installation, Training and Consulting
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Anderson <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 8:51 AM
Subject: [FW1] Nokia vs. NT
>
> We are looking into switching our existing Firewall platform from NT/Win2K
> to Nokia. I am curious to see how those of you using Checkpoint on Nokia
> like it.
> We are hoping that this switch will lower down time and decrease
> administrative overhead. The specific model we are planning to purchase
is
> the Nokia 440. We plan to purchase two to provide load balancing and
> redundancy.
> Of course our vendor likes our plan but I want to hear from some admins
that
> are actually supporting this platform. Thanks in advance!
>
> Tim Anderson
>
>
>
============================================================================
====
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
> http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
>
============================================================================
====
>
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
|
|
