|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] Secure Client vs SecuRemote
>If the users are outside your network protected by some >other firewall, you would use SecuRemote. If they are unprotected >you might want to use Secure Client. Note that Secure Client >requires additional cost and licensing. The difference is that> >Secure Client provides some measure of client 'protection' and >SecuRemote does not. Another difference is that SecuRemote easily supports clustered firewalls, whereas SecureClient does not, unless you dumb it down to resemble SecuRemote. I think CP is planning to improve clustering support for SecureClient in a future release, but not sure exactly when. Mark L. Decker Rainfinity [email protected] www.rainfinity.com================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
