[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW1] Pros and Cons of IP440 vs Solaris Checkpoint
inline comments. On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Jason Costomiris wrote: > : For example, you cannot add software to assist the management of routes > : without paying for it. Not like dynamic routing has any place on a > : firewall, but that's just an example of the closed nature of the Nokia > : product. > > Completely untrue. There is an unsupported program, available through > the knowledge base called "addstatic". It's function is to make it easy > to add static routes to a unit. > I think we are failing to notice the difference between statis and dynamic:)) > : On the downside, if you are an expert in UNIX, you can't configure the > : thing. > > Again, not true.... There's no reason you can't configure it via the > CLI. Don't expect to be supported, but there's no reason you can't do that. > But if you configure the solaris box, you are still supported. No one wants to be put into an unsupported situation. > : In my own opinion, the Nokia product had immense potential that was > : sidetracked by capitalizing on people who previously overpaid for a > : massive and overpowered Sun system for their packet-filtering firewall > : device. > > You forgot to mention the fact that IPSO includes built-in HA functions that > cost thousands of $$ to add to Solaris. You also forgot to mention how much > easier it is to manage IPSO releases than it is to manage the myriads of > Solaris patches. > Correct me if I am wrong(and I likely am), but isn't the nokia HA solution just in the routing protocol? I mean VRRP is just the standards based redundant routing protocol resulting from ciscos HSRP, right? My guess is that GateD doesn't support this though(yet), so maybe they are a leg up here. But if you can find a routing daemon capable of supporting HSRP/VRRP then you could easily implement your own HA(well,.. as HA as nokia anyway) solution. > -- --Paul ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|