Re: [FW1] Provider-1

["Andrea Gatti" <gatti@FW1-NOSPAMbsecure.it>]

Did anyone try this solution?

Any other suggestion?

Thank you

----- Original Message -----

From: Ilya Akinfiev

To: 'Andrea Gatti'

Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 5:08 AM

Subject: RE: [FW1] Provider-1

you may be able to do some fancy Static NAT footwork on the firewall protecting the P-1 box - i.e. use private addresses on the P-1 box and then translate the outgoing traffic from each CMA to the same IP , and translate incoming traffic from each fw module to the individual CMA's IP.... not sure if it will work tho

 

just a thought - if you're implementing P-1, which at my last recollection costs about $100K, shouldn't you be able to spare some IP addresses for a few bucks??

 

cheers

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com [mailto:owner-fw-1-mailinglist@lists.us.checkpoint.com]On Behalf Of Andrea Gatti
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 8:10 AM
To: fw1
Subject: [FW1] Provider-1

Hi,

 

has anybody implemented Provider-1?

I guess I have to give a pubblic address to every cma and put it in the Master tab on the firewall module.

Isn't this a waste of IP addresses?

Any suggestion?

 

Thank u

.

 

Andrea