Re: [FW1] VRRP and cat6509 switches

[Carric Dooley <carric@FW1-NOSPAMcom2usa.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I would use Monitored circuit instead of VRRP2 to avoid any routing black
holes. Have you tried that?


Carric Dooley
Senior Consultant
COM2:Interactive Media

"But this one goes to eleven."
- -- Nigel Tufnel


On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Dave Dunaway (ncc0296) wrote:

> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm still having problems with an VRRP issue and I'm hoping
> someone can shed some light on how to solve this problem. 
> 
> Firstly, I've upgraded our two Nokia 650's to IPSO 3.3 in
> order to solve the issue of the VIP not being pingable. 
> Our cat6509 switches see the VRRP traffic but can't add
> an entry in their arp tables for the MAC of the VIP. 
> 
> I was told upgrading to IPSO 3.3 fixes this problem. I've
> got the Nokia's using VRRP v2 since they are talking to
> a cisco device and I've enable IP traffic to the firewall
> from Voyager. Problem is that I'm still unable to get
> the switches to add an arp entry for the firewalls VIP.
> 
> Does anyone have any ideas as to how I could fix this
> problem up? 
> 
> TIA.
> 
> -- 
> Dave Dunaway [ddunaway@corp.attcanada.ca]
> 
> 
> ================================================================================
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ================================================================================
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.1
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iQA/AwUBOl+tw1UqWOkDpMZ2EQIC7QCgjcTzUt/MZxFA2d1t93+JVJmCrloAoNEv
TsuTY1DiVdPUTAVgEZNyIBDz
=aI+j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================