NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: FW: [FW1] Platform Question



Well the switch was to free up the Sun box for database operations PLUS our
staff is much more NT literate than Unix. Our load is very LOW, T1x2 to
internet and at MAX 20 simultaneous SecureRemote users.

So, that being said... here are answers to your questions -- appreciate
everyone's help, have gotten lot's of responses now :)

It's FW-1 sp2 - still have not got a definitive answer as to whether this
supports SMP or not.
The 220R was a single 450Mhz
The Intel NICs are set to AUTO, but both their diags and SNMP report they
are running at Full Duplex

Thanks again to everyone for trying to work through this with me!

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2001 10:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FW: [FW1] Platform Question

I'm not trying to be a smart a$$, but I wonder how many people would go
FROM solaris TO windows.

I don't know much about anything, but I have heard that Solaris machines
work much better under HIGH load then windows machines.  Is your server
under high load?

I wouldn't be TOO suprised if your users are actually experiencing a
performance hit.  My reasoning here is:

-What version of FW-1? Is it a version that supports SMP?
-was the 220R dual?  what CPUs did it have?  Two 450's perhaps?
-does the Windows FW-1 version support SMP?  If it doesn't then you are
comparing two boxes with very similar hardware(assuming worst case
on the # of CPU's in the 220R)... but one with the overhead of an
expensive qui.
-even though your RAM has increased, if you weren't using all 128mb on the
Solaris machine... then it wouldn't make any difference.

(PS.  Have you checked your speed and duplex on the NICs on the NT
machine?  Autonegociation is worse then useless.)

On Thu, 4 Jan 2001 [email protected] wrote:

> 
> It's funny, I didn't get one single reply on this... does that mean NO ONE
> has ever run into this, or is it just something no one wants to talk
about?
> 
<SNIP>


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================



 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.