|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] Content virus scanner
is it me or does this forum repeat it sefl???? It's the third time I receive this mail -----Original Message----- From: Mike Glassman - Admin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 07:32 To: 'Sturrus, Marvin' Cc: 'fw-1 listserv' Subject: RE: [FW1] Content virus scanner Marvin, I use esfae ver 2.1 with 850 nodes (WS's) and no problems at all. If you go to ver 3.0, you need to consider that it isn't as you say a CVP, but instead, is connected between your internall firewall leg, and your network, so in effect : Internet - Firewall - Esafe30 - Internal Network As such, it needs two nic's (at least), and does IP forwarding. You will need to change your routers so the default gateway changes from your firewalls internall leg to the internal leg of the Esafe30 server. The idea behind it is very nice indeed, and it's faster then a cvp, and protects against much more then the current 2.1 version does, but, it adds a second point of failure to your Internet access. Whereas with a CVP, if the cvp is down it's a simple issue of getting things working again, by changing the rules, if this server is down, you will have to change the routers def gateway in order to bypass it. You will then also have to change settings on the firwall so that it knows there's no gateway there. The site for the beta of 30 is at http://www.ealaddin.com/esafe/beta/esg3beta.html (but I think you already know this), but if not, it explains quite a bit more on how it works. Aladdin are supposed to be working on a CVP version of this, which is what I am waiting for. If this issue doesn't bother you, you can go with it. Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: Sturrus, Marvin [SMTP:[email protected]] > Sent: ã ãöîáø 20 2000 13:32 > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: [FW1] Content virus scanner > > > Hi all, > > Can anyone tell me what a good content virus scanner is to work together > with Checkpoint Firewall-1? I am familiar with e-safe and a little bit > with > Trend Micro. At this point (we are still in a testing phase) I can't tell > what's best. I know e-safe performs not so well (2.1) in a large network > (more than 500 nodes) because of CVP. But on the other hand their gui and > logging are much better then Trend Micro's and they just released 3.0 > which > is no longer depending on CVP. > > Can anyone supply me with some facts or links that will help decide what > product is the best for us? Or does anyone have some experience already > with > e-Safe 3.0? > > Thanks! > > Marvin Sturrus > > > > ========================================================================== > ====== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ========================================================================== > ====== ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== *============================================================================================* L'information confidentielle incluse dans ce courrier électronique s'adresse uniquement à la personne, physique ou morale, visée. Toute utilisation, copie, divulgation ou distribution non autorisée de ce document est strictement interdite. Si vous n'êtes pas la personne concernée par cette transmission électronique, veuillez détruire ce document et nous aviser par courriel ou par téléphone au. Les opinions émises dans ce courriel ne représentent pas nécessairement des opinions véhiculées par Dessin Structural B.D. inc. *============================================================================================* The confidential Information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. Any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of this document is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this document and notify us by e-mail or by phone. Any opinions contained within this e-mail are not necessarily the opinions of B.D. Structural Design inc. *============================================================================================*Title: RE: [FW1] Content virus scanner is it me or does this forum repeat it sefl???? It's the third time I receive this mail -----Original Message-----
Marvin, I use esfae ver 2.1 with 850 nodes (WS's) and no problems at all. If you go to ver 3.0, you need to consider that it isn't as you say a CVP,
Internet - Firewall - Esafe30 - Internal Network As such, it needs two nic's (at least), and does IP forwarding. You will
The idea behind it is very nice indeed, and it's faster then a cvp, and
The site for the beta of 30 is at
Aladdin are supposed to be working on a CVP version of this, which is what I
If this issue doesn't bother you, you can go with it. Mike > -----Original Message-----
================================================================================
================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
