[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW1] NT vs Unix as FW platform
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 12:19:27PM +0200, Michael Liberte wrote: : : I would say that the test setup is a bit unfair. : After looking at the graphs, almost noone bothers to check the hardware and : software configuration of the machines that participated in the test. : As a matter of fact, they have almost nothing in common in terms of : processing power, patch levels, etc.. : http://www.checkpoint.com/products/firewall-1/pbrief.html Agreed, the other test isn't a true measure of FW-1 performance. This other one is much more accurate. Why? Do users *ONLY* move VPN traffic through their firewalls? Heck no. VPN, while very important, is certainly not the bulk of firewall traffic today. The other problem these performance studies fail to address is the manageability of the platforms. We all know that it's easy to get an NT box up and running. Keeping it that way, well, that's another story entirely. Platforms like IPSO, Solaris and Linux are far easier to maintain (far better patch management, no DLL-Hell, etc.). I'd like to see a more "fair" comparison on Check Point's site. Look at the different machines, none of them have similar CPU power. Obviously, since they include RS/6k's and Sun E250's, some adjustments would need to be made, but we've got 3 Intel-based platforms here, and they're not even close: 1 x P-III 700 (Nokia IP650) 2 x P-III 600 (NT4 SP3 - hey, isn't SP4 the earliest that's Y2k compliant?) 2 x Xeon 550 (Linux - RedHat 6.1) Why not put all 3 platforms on a single P-III 700 and let them duke it out? : http://www.checkpoint.com/products/vpn1/vpn1perfdata.html -- Jason Costomiris <>< | Technologist, geek, human. jcostom {at} jasons {dot} org | http://www.jasons.org/ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|