|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] NT or Unix
I've seen in cp4.0 that if you don't change the name of the policy the FW will tell you that it has succeeded but the updates won't be there. Especially when you are doing an update to the NAT rules. Changing the policy name allow it to correctly update. Paul Aho-----Original Message----- From: Andrew Bagrin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 3:18 PM To: Carl E. Mankinen; Jeff Quinonez; 'Jack Klein'; [email protected] Subject: Re: [FW1] NT or Unix I had that problem, unfortunatly bouncing the service didn't help. I had to clear the state dir. Andrew Bagrin Secure-1www.secure-1.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Carl E. Mankinen <[email protected]> To: Jeff Quinonez <[email protected]>; 'Jack Klein' <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 3:53 PM Subject: Re: [FW1] NT or Unix > > Well, I just had a problem on NT installation that I have seen a couple times now. > I am running CP2000 SP2 at this site and what happens is that I install the policy > via the GUI client. It shows that it has complied it successfully and supposedly installed ok. > > However, my old rule base is still in effect. > > So I compile install several more times, to no avail. > > I then bounce the FW-1 services on the enforcement server and VIOLA the new > rulebase is in effect. > > Anyone else experience this too? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Quinonez" <[email protected]> > To: "'Jack Klein'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:21 PM > Subject: RE: [FW1] NT or Unix > > > > > > Flamebait! LOL Kidding of course... I would choose Solaris, if for nothing > > else because of IP forwarding. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jack Klein [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 11:04 AM > > To: '[email protected]' > > Subject: [FW1] NT or Unix > > > > > > > > We are in the midst of a controversy and would like to hear some opinions. > > Should we install a FW-1 on an NT or a Unix machine? Why? > > Thanks for all of your opinions. > > > > > > > > ============================================================================ > > ==== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > > ============================================================================ > > ==== > > > > > > ============================================================================ ==== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > > ============================================================================ ==== > > > > > > ============================================================================ ==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ============================================================================ ==== ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
