NETWORK PRESENCE ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT
 


Search
display results
words begin  exact words  any words part 

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FW1] NT or Unix



On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 03:31:52PM -0500, Dan Guinn wrote:

root@ [/] >>uname -a
SunOS  5.6 Generic_105181-15 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
root@xxx [/] >>uptime
 11:21am  up 508 day(s), 38 min(s),  5 users,  load average: 0.06, 0.05, 0.05
root@xxx [/] >>fw ver
This is Check Point VPN-1(TM) & FireWall-1(R) Version 4.0 Build xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
root@xxx [/] >>

> 
> I had it running for a site with 250+ nodes on a Compaq ML330 server (733
> CPU, 256MB RAM) on RH6.2.
> 
> Not a call on that box in 3 months.
> 
> Dan Guinn
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Quinonez [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 4:40 PM
> To: '[email protected]'; 'Jack Klein';
> [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [FW1] NT or Unix
> 
> 
> 
> Suh weet. What type of hardware are you speaking of on the Linux side? Also
> what flav of Linux? We have a Redhat box, um 6.2 (for shites and giggles)
> running on an lowend HP E60 and it hauls. I always bring up Linux solutions
> to my IT Director, but he like others, fear the penguins.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Decker [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 12:30 PM
> To: 'Jack Klein'; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [FW1] NT or Unix
> 
> 
> 
> I can vouch for Dan on this point.  I've seen several different
> benchmark results that give Unix a 20-40% advantage over NT on max
> throughput, depending on the Unix flavor.  Solaris performance is hard
> to compare fairly because the HW platforms used to test are always
> different, but you can do a nice apples-to-apples with Linux.  Of the
> three (NT/Solaris/Linux), Linux seems to be the best performer,
> especially in terms of overall cost per Mbit of throughput.  However,
> you'll probably find better commercial support for Solaris and NT than
> Linux at this point.
> 
> If you're not going to be maxing out the box, I say just "go with what
> you know".
> 
> Mark L. Decker
> Rainfinity
> [email protected]
> www.rainfinity.com
>> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Guinn
> > To: 'Jack Klein'; '[email protected]'
> > Subject: RE: [FW1] NT or Unix
> >
> >  Both seem to work about the same (unless you put them under a lot
> > of load, in which case Linux seems to be faster for throughput).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ============================================================================
> ====
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ============================================================================
> ====
> 
> 
> ============================================================================
> ====
>      To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
>                http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
> ============================================================================
> ====



-- 
Hans-Joachim Hoetger              voice: +49-5241-80-88990
mediaWays GmbH                        NMW-T1 (Technologie)

"Gut ist auch des Emporkommen von Linux als Herausforderer 
von Microsoft."       Angela Merkel (Die Zeit, 4.Mai 2000)


================================================================================
     To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
               http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================



 
----------------------------------

ABOUT SERVICES PRODUCTS TRAINING CONTACT US SEARCH SUPPORT SITE MAP LEGAL
   All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.