[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] VRRP Failover Question
Use a Hub vs Switch. Probably have better luck with VRRP. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel David Benson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 7:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [FW1] VRRP Failover Question We want to use VRRP for failover only. We have one NAP connection. My first thought is that we will need to put a switch in between the NAP and the firewalls. My concern is the single point of failure now faced on the switch. We have a fully redundant Cisco 6506 behind the firewall. I really don't feel good about slapping a blade in it to take the place of this external switch. So, I have several questions: 1) Are my inclinations correct on the security issues with putting internal switch on the outside? 2) What are cheap redundant switch solutions out there? 3) What are other people doing out there to handle VRRP failover? Keep in mind that I do not care about load balancing. Thanks! -Dan ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|