[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW1] NT or Unix
Dean, I have to disagree with you, Sun and NT in industry standard performance tests both yield 105 - 120 mbit of throughput. Nokia about 180-190 and linux 220-230. So the only system capable of handling 4 100mb cards completely is the linux version. CryptoTech Dean Cunningham wrote: > The linux version has been recently ported , which has ment some > stability/installation issues. It will settle down, as did other ports like > NT. > > If performance is not an issue then NT/linux is fine. If your are expecting > to use say 4 100MB cards with NAT and get high throughput then Sun or Nokia > are the "only" options (hey I may of missed one , but nt and linux ain't an > option.) > > An overview of your intended requirements would enable others to give more > accurate suggestions. > > There are archives of this list at www.securepoint.com/fw1 > > cheers > Dean > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jack Klein [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 2:04 PM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: [FW1] NT or Unix > > We are in the midst of a controversy and would like to hear some opinions. > Should we install a FW-1 on an NT or a Unix machine? Why? > Thanks for all of your opinions. > > *************************************************** > This e-mail is not an official statement of the > Waikato Regional Council unless otherwise stated. > Visit our website http://www.ew.govt.nz > *************************************************** > > ================================================================================ > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ================================================================================ ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|