|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] Partition off a class C within a 10.x.x.x RFC 1918 net
He has hundreds of internal subnets, all of them are /24, however, he finds it very convenient not to create them all in the rulebase, but to have one class A object instead. This is a common thing, he probably has an internal router(s) that are aware of all the subnets. -----Original Message----- From: Christine Tran [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 5:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [FW1] Partition off a class C within a 10.x.x.x RFC 1918 net >"Reed Mohn, Anders" <[email protected]> wrote: >Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 00:31:03 +0100 > >Since any 10.0.0.0 address is assumed to >be local, no packet ever makes it to the >FW/router/gateway. > > >>From: Christine Tran [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: 30. november 2000 23:06 >> >>Why is this hard? Am I missing something really obvious? Yes, clearly .. like my brain. :) I thought Greg's original post intended for 10.250.1.0/24 to be completely broken off from his intranet. If he wants to keep the Class A & Class C talking, it wouldn't work. I'll line up for my allotment of humble pie & forty lashes. CT ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
