[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] dnsinfo.C & LMhosts
I'm having the exact same problem. A sample posted to this list would be great! Thanks, -----Original Message----- From: Johnson, Dave [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 9:53 AM To: 'CryptoTech'; Johnson, Dave Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [FW1] dnsinfo.C & LMhosts Crypto, I hate to impose but that would be very helpful. I would also like to thank all those who responded !! Thanks Crypto, Dave -----Original Message----- From: CryptoTech [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 8:39 AM To: Johnson, Dave Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [FW1] dnsinfo.C & LMhosts Dave, Yes, the lmhosts file on the local system SHOULD be updated. I have seen this work, but as you have noted, it is very syntax sensitive, one wrong space, one space instead of a tab. It would be nice if check point would come out with a utility to generate this file based on a gui or a command line utility..... If you would like a reference, I will be happy to gen a dnsinfo.c file and post it to the list. Regards, CryptoTech "Johnson, Dave" wrote: > I hope someone can answer this. Am I correct in thinking that the > information under the LMdata header in the dnsinfo.C will be appended to the > LMhosts file on the SecureClient machine? > > I have two samples of a dsninfo.C file (both from CheckPoint) that I > personalized for our network and installed in the /conf directory of the > management console. After doing fwstop & start and pushing the policy, I > would log in with SecureClient, download the topo and check the LMhosts file > and find that it was not updated. > > This would seem to indicate that the syntax of the dnsinfo.C file is > incorrect. However, I did a copy/paste with each of the sample files that I > received from CheckPoint and neither of them worked so it doesn't seem like > that is the case. > > Could someone tell me if my initial thinking is correct that the local > LMhosts file should be updated and/or any thoughts on why you think it's not > working? Also, is there any reference material anywhere that would tell me > exactly what the syntax should be? > > Thanks in advance for any and all help, > Dave > > ============================================================================ ==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ============================================================================ ==== ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ============================================================================ ==== To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|