[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW1] Securemote issue
Thats how all Regals users are setup and we don't have any complaints Andrew Bagrin Secure-1www.secure-1.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan Guinn <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 3:02 PM Subject: RE: [FW1] Securemote issue > > Good point...DHCP could make life much easier, but it could also make the > machine complain that it can't get an IP when it's remote. > > Dan Guinn > NetStar Communications > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Bagrin [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 1:39 PM > To: Kimberly Newton; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [FW1] Securemote issue > > > > Why don't you put them on DHCP in the office? > Andrew Bagrin > Secure-1 >> www.secure-1.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kimberly Newton <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; > <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 5:21 PM > Subject: Re: [FW1] Securemote issue > > > > > > I have a question regarding this, also. I went ahead and took the IP > address > > off and it worked wonderfully. Thank you very much, Dan. However, now what > > do we do when the people are back in the office and need to be on the > > network with an IP address? Is there a way to make this work without > having > > to have the user delete their IP address when on the road and then plug > the > > info back in when they get back to the office? > > > > >From: "Dan Snyder" <[email protected]> > > >To: "Robert MacDonald" <[email protected]>, > > ><[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > > >Subject: Re: [FW1] Securemote issue > > >Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 20:02:01 -0500 > > > > > > > > >are these workstations that are used in the office as well as remote use? > > >if you are sure that the encryption domain has been verified correctly, > > >make > > >sure that the workstation doesn't have an address, of the network you are > > >trying to attach to, assigned to the nic. if so release it unless it is > > >win2000 workstation > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Robert MacDonald" <[email protected]> > > >To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]> > > >Sent: Monday, November 20, 2000 8:11 AM > > >Subject: Re: [FW1] Securemote issue > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Idan, > > > > > > > > Assuming(ack) that you have the excryption domain > > > > defined properly, it sounds like you don't have > > > > a rule to allow IKE or FWZ. > > > > > > > > Your firewall object should have either of these > > > > checked. What does the remote clients' user.C > > > > look like? Does it include the correct systems? > > > > > > > > By any chance, do you have a local NIC defined > > > > on the client? If so, that also may be your problem. > > > > > > > > What rule was associated with the decrypt log entry? > > > > Are you sure there wasn't any other log entries. Do > > > > you have a sniffer available to you? > > > > > > > > Robert > > > > > > > > - - > > > > Robert P. MacDonald, Network Engineer > > > > Team Lead, e-Business Infrastructure > > > > G o r d o n F o o d S e r v i c e > > > > Voice:email: [email protected] > > > > > > > > >>> Idan Dolev <[email protected]> 11/19/00 11:15:14 AM >>> > > > > > > > > > >Hi guys, > > > > > > > > > >Has anybody encountered a problem with securemote where you get > > > > >authenticated by the firewall but still no communication with the > > >internal > > > > >lan. > > > > > > > > > >I already checked the encryption domain, rewrote the rule, > > >anti-spoofing > > > > >checked, the user was checked, fwz and IKE had the same behavior. > > > > > > > > > >I could see in the event log a decrypt connection to my client be > still > > >no > > > > >data shown on my client. > > > > > > > > > >The firewall is 4.1 sp2 on NT, > > > > > > > > > >Any comments before I break down and cry...... > > > > > > > > > >Idan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=========================================================================== > = > > >==== > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the > instructions > > >at > > > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > > > > > > > >=========================================================================== > = > > >==== > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=========================================================================== > ===== > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions > at > > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > > > >=========================================================================== > ===== > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > _________ > > Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : > http://explorer.msn.com > > > > > > > > > ============================================================================ > ==== > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > > > ============================================================================ > ==== > > > > ============================================================================ > ==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ============================================================================ > ==== > > > ============================================================================ ==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|