|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW1] SecuRemote
Should not be a problem if you subnet mask is 255.255.0.0 or 255.255.255.0. But not Class A. They would be on the same network and your redirector would not send it to a remote network. Therefore bypassing SR. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kelly, John" <[email protected]> To: "Fw-1-Mailinglist (E-mail)" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 11:53 AM Subject: [FW1] SecuRemote > > I can't seem to find anything on SR and routing. I remember > hearing/reading > somewhere of problems using SR if your client and server both use NAT > and > the private networks are similiar. My SR client local net is 10.130.1.0 > (all > our networks are of the 10.x.x.x range) and my client is statically NATd > to > 63.69.x.82. I am using FWZ for encryption and can connect to the > Firewall-1 > and retreive a key. However the resources I want to connect to are on a > 10.16.7.0 network behind the firewall and I cannot connect to those > resources. The SR icon stays idle in the taskbar, so it looks like SR is > not > processing any packets. > > > ======================================================================== > ======== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions > at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ======================================================================== > ======== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
