[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW1] Securemote - modifying users.c
No offense to Phoneboy, but the option for nat based communication is passed as an option in the negotiation. If you are using RFC1918 addresses, it will be chosen automatically. I have been using this configuration for several months now, and it is working great. If you are having problems, please let me know and I'll try to help. Cheers, CryptoTech Robert MacDonald wrote: > Estela, > > Notice that the filename is userC.c and not > userS.c ('c' and not 's') > > The file userc.C is overwritten everytime the site > is updated or recreated. > > Robert > > >>> "Estela Ruiz" <[email protected]> 11/20/00 5:09:35 PM >>> > > > >Hello all, > > > >We are trying to configure Securemote and Firewall-1 4.1 sp2 using IKE > > > >The topology is as follows: > > > >PC with Securemote - Cisco router (static NAT) - (ISDN) - VPN Fw-1 - Local > >network > > > >We have read "SecuRemote Client and NAT FAQ" in phoneboy.com, and "Version > >4.1 SP2 Release Notes". > >We made the necessary changes, but it does not work. > > > >Anyway, there is a strange behaviour. When we add the atribute > >"force_udp_encapsulation (true) to activate forced mode > >in "users.c", this attribute disappears!! We add it again, and it disappears > >again! > > > >Any idea? All the suggestions will be helpful. > > > >Thanks in advance, > >Estela. > > ================================================================================ > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ================================================================================ ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|