[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [FW1] drop on rule 0
Hi Brian I suggest the always instructive website www.phoneboy.com/fw-1 I searched the FAQs there for "Rule 0" and here you are: What is Rule 0? Q: What is rule 0 and where can it be found? I looked under the /etc/fw/database and /etc/fw/lib directories. Nothing jumps out at me. A: Rule 0 is typically stuff not explicitly listed in the rulebase. This includes: Anti-Spoofing: This is set on the interface tab of your firewall object. If spoof track is set to "log" or "alert", a rule 0 entry will show in your log. A "drop" on Rule 0 typically means that incoming packet violated your anti-spoofing policy for that interface. A "reject" on Rule 0 typically means that an outgoing packet (one that has been accepted by your security policy and routed by the OS) is violating your anti-spoof rules because the packet is being routed out the wrong interface. Authentication Failures: This is set in the Authentication tab of the rulebase properties. If this is set to "log" or "alert", any failed authentication attempts will show as a rule 0 log. SYNDefender warnings may get logged as rule 0. The "Display Warning Messages" checkbox in the SYNDefender tab of the rulebase properties is where this can be disabled. SecuRemote authentications (the successful ones) can also appear as a rule 0 accept. This is controlled by the "Enable Decryption on Accept" checkbox in the Security Policy tab of the Rulebase Properties. Anything dropped by FireWall-1's IP Options checking will log as rule 0. The logging is controlled by the "IP Options Drop Track" section of the Log and Alert tab of the Rulebase Properties. *snip* Hope that helps Cheers Ralf G. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: <[email protected]> An: <[email protected]> Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. November 2000 23:45 Betreff: [FW1] drop on rule 0 > > Does anyone know why my log view shows me that attempts to access servers > via certain tcp ports are being dropped via rule 0? > > The other entries reference actual rules in the rulebase, but there is no > rule 0? > > Thanks, > Brian > > > ============================================================================ ==== > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at > http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html > ============================================================================ ==== ================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|