|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [FW1] Small office integration.
> Oliver Bogen wrote: > but if there is more then one User on the Remote (DSL) side > there would be a NAT router before the Secure Remote > connection, so there should not be a very strange security > problem, in fact the Secure Client or any other Desktop > Firewall would be a good idea if you are connecting to your > Site directly useing any dialup Internet connection .... Actually, my suggestion was to do it without a NAT router, so Dan's concern is still valid. However, Oliver raises a very good point that ANY connection, even a dialup connection with a dynamically assigned address, could open up the SecuRemote client to potential compromise. That's why CP introduced SecureClient. Mark L. Decker Rainfinity [email protected] www.rainfinity.com================================================================================ To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html ================================================================================
|
||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
