Search
display
10
30
100
results
words begin
exact words
any words part
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
[FW1] Opinon Requested - to NAT or not to NAT DMZ Addresses
To
: <
[email protected]
>
Subject
: [FW1] Opinon Requested - to NAT or not to NAT DMZ Addresses
From
: "Brian Burns" <
[email protected]
>
Date
: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 22:41:05 -0600
Sender
:
[email protected]
I am doing a redesign of our existing network and have been asked to use private addressing with NAT. I am not pro/against it - but I have always used valid addresses on my DMZ servers.
So... why would one want to use NAT on your DMZ devices?
Comments?
Brian
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [FW1] Opinon Requested - to NAT or not to NAT DMZ Addresses
From:
CryptoTech <
[email protected]
>
Prev by Date:
RE: [FW1] ALLOW_NON_SYN_RULEBASE_MATCH question
Next by Date:
RE: [FW1] Nokia: Possible serious bug in IPSO Voyager interface.
Previous by thread:
[FW1] Upgrade from CP2000 to SP2
Next by thread:
Re: [FW1] Opinon Requested - to NAT or not to NAT DMZ Addresses
Index(es):
Date
Thread
All contents © 2004 Network Presence, LLC. All rights reserved.