Search

	display results
words begin exact words any words part

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[FW1] Opinon Requested - to NAT or not to NAT DMZ Addresses

To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [FW1] Opinon Requested - to NAT or not to NAT DMZ Addresses
From: "Brian Burns" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 22:41:05 -0600
Sender: [email protected]

I am doing a redesign of our existing network and have been asked to use private addressing with NAT. I am not pro/against it - but I have always used valid addresses on my DMZ servers.

So... why would one want to use NAT on your DMZ devices?

Comments?

Brian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [FW1] Opinon Requested - to NAT or not to NAT DMZ Addresses
  - From: CryptoTech <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: RE: [FW1] ALLOW_NON_SYN_RULEBASE_MATCH question
Next by Date: RE: [FW1] Nokia: Possible serious bug in IPSO Voyager interface.
Previous by thread: [FW1] Upgrade from CP2000 to SP2
Next by thread: Re: [FW1] Opinon Requested - to NAT or not to NAT DMZ Addresses
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread